John E. Sitter
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
Papers in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 7
- Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature 3
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 2
- History 4
- Co-authors
- David Fairer (1 shared paper)James Anderson Winn (1 shared paper)Claude Rawson (1 shared paper)Leopold Damrosch (1 shared paper)Robert F. Gleckner (1 shared paper)Terry Eagleton (1 shared paper)Terry J. Castle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment (3 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Huntington Library Quarterly (1 paper)ELH (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John E. Sitter
21 papers receiving 116 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Literature and Literary Theory 115
- Classics 36
- History 58
- Museology 17
- Communication 29
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Sitter
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Sitter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Sitter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Sitter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Sitter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Sitter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Sitter. The network helps show where John E. Sitter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside John E. Sitter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 1 |
About John E. Sitter
John E. Sitter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Classics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (7 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (115 citations), Classics (36 citations), History (58 citations), Museology (17 citations) and Communication (29 citations). John E. Sitter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Fairer, James Anderson Winn, Claude Rawson, Leopold Damrosch, Robert F. Gleckner, Terry Eagleton and Terry J. Castle. Their work appears in journals such as ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, Eighteenth-Century Studies, The Modern Language Review, Huntington Library Quarterly and ELH.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.