John E. Reid
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Papers in
- Law 7
- Criminal Law and Evidence 7
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 10
- Co-authors
- Fred E. Inbau (9 shared papers)Lorenz Wernisch (10 shared papers)Hiroshi Nikaido (3 shared papers)Frank S. Horvath (2 shared papers)Sascha Ott (5 shared papers)Kalle Gehring (1 shared paper)Hoki Fung (1 shared paper)M. Azim Surani (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Bioinformatics (5 papers)The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) (3 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Popular Music & Society (2 papers)Human Mutation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
John E. Reid
46 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Social Psychology 419
- Clinical Psychology 239
- Molecular Biology 637
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 151
- Biophysics 40
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Reid
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Reid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Reid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Reid. The network helps show where John E. Reid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Reid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 243 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 91 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 88 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 83 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 73 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 63 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 61 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 45 | |
| 11 | 1964 | 39 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 31 | |
| 17 | Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal Interrogation and Confessions | 2013 | 28 |
| 18 | 1953 | 25 | |
| 19 | 1953 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 21 |
About John E. Reid
John E. Reid is a scholar working on Law, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology, Music and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (7 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (7 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (419 citations), Clinical Psychology (239 citations), Molecular Biology (637 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 citations) and Biophysics (40 citations). John E. Reid has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Fred E. Inbau, Lorenz Wernisch, Hiroshi Nikaido, Frank S. Horvath, Sascha Ott, Kalle Gehring, Hoki Fung, M. Azim Surani, Florian Buettner and Benjamin David Simons. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), Journal of Biological Chemistry, Popular Music & Society and Human Mutation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.