John E. Reaugh

31 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

John E. Reaugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Mechanics of Materials 603
  • Geophysics 253
  • Materials Chemistry 490
  • Aerospace Engineering 197
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 45
Replace Mark Elert with:
Mark Elert United States
H. Keo Springer United States
Davis Tonks United States
F. Zhang Canada
Cole Yarrington United States
Chengda Dai China
Dennis L. Paisley United States
J. R. Asay United States
K. Baumung Germany
J.F. Thomas Belgium
John E. Reaugh relative to Mark Elert United States Mark Elert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Mark Elert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Reaugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Reaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Reaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Reaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Reaugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Reaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Reaugh. The network helps show where John E. Reaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Reaugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Reaugh Line = papers co-authored together John E. Reaugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015167
2 2009132
3 1978111
4 201892
5 200735
6 199933
7 200325
8 200425
9 201419
10 198717
11 201813
12 201210
13
Computer simulations of ballistic experiments
19878
14 20127
15 20126
16 20046
17 20176
18 20215
19 19973
20
Explosive Response to Low Speed Spigot Impact
20122

About John E. Reaugh

John E. Reaugh is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, Geophysics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Energetic Materials and Combustion (23 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (16 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (15 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (3 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (2 papers) and Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (603 citations), Geophysics (253 citations), Materials Chemistry (490 citations), Aerospace Engineering (197 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (45 citations). John E. Reaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nathan R. Barton, N. W. Winter, Laurence E. Fried, Ryan Austin, H. Keo Springer, Brian J. Moran, D.M. Norris, Sorin Bastea, Craig M. Tarver and Albert L. Nichols. Their work appears in journals such as Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics, Journal of Applied Physics, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact