John E. Powers

28 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

John E. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 77
  • Filtration and Separation 24
  • Computational Mechanics 179
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 42
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 50
Replace A. Harmens with:
A. Harmens Netherlands
Peter Graßmann Switzerland
R.F. Hilbert Germany
Åsmund Ervik Norway
Walter J. Korchinsky United Kingdom
Lev P. Filippov Russia
Magnus Aa. Gjennestad Norway
Pierre Costesèque France
Aluf Orell Israel
Neil S. Berman United States
John E. Powers relative to A. Harmens Netherlands A. Harmens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
A. Harmens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Powers. The network helps show where John E. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John E. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Powers Line = papers co-authored together John E. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195787
2 197044
3 196224
4 196923
5 197020
6 198020
7 197017
8 196916
9 197114
10 196910
11 196110
12 196710
13 19627
14 19667
15 19667
16 19616
17 19705
18 19695
19 19683
20 19663

About John E. Powers

John E. Powers is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (12 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (10 papers), Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques (9 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (7 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (5 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (4 papers), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (4 papers) and Process Optimization and Integration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (77 citations), Filtration and Separation (24 citations), Computational Mechanics (179 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (42 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (50 citations). John E. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. R. Wilke, K.E. Starling, Donald L. Katz, V.F. Yesavage, Joseph D. Henry, Thomas D. Taylor, Jack Winnick, Tamaki Miyazaki, Alan E. Mather and David L. Katz. Their work appears in journals such as AIChE Journal, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, Communications of the ACM and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact