John E. Lane

1.4k citations
64 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Lane

58 papers receiving 1000 citations

Peers

John E. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Atmospheric Science 378
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 220
  • Global and Planetary Change 268
  • Environmental Engineering 122
  • Ocean Engineering 109
Replace Oleg Zikanov with:
Oleg Zikanov United States
Anna Pomyalov Israel
Björn Hof Austria
Marc Avila Germany
U. Klein Germany
Mark Weber United States
Zhenxing Liu China
Yves Tessier France
W. O. Criminale United States
Yasuo Kuga United States
John E. Lane relative to Oleg Zikanov United States Oleg Zikanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Oleg Zikanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Lane. The network helps show where John E. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Lane Line = papers co-authored together John E. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009360
2
Simple Analytic Expressions for the Magnetic Field of a Circular Current Loop
200194
3 201190
4 197981
5 201158
6 200848
7 200026
8 199724
9 195522
10 200421
11 199420
12 200819
13 201218
14 201317
15 197815
16 199014
17 199311
18
A Review of Discrete Element Method (DEM) Particle Shapes and Size Distributions for Lunar Soil
201010
19 20079
20 20039

About John E. Lane

John E. Lane is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Aerospace Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Computational Mechanics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (18 papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (17 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (16 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (5 papers), Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (5 papers) and Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (378 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (220 citations), Global and Planetary Change (268 citations), Environmental Engineering (122 citations) and Ocean Engineering (109 citations). John E. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip T. Metzger, Takis Kasparis, Silas Michaelides, Péter Bauer, Emmanouil N. Anagnostou, Vincenzo Levizzani, Christopher Immer, Thomas H. Spurling, Jacob Smith and Robert C. Youngquist. Their work appears in journals such as Particulate Science And Technology, Atmospheric Research, Acta Astronautica, Computer Music Journal and Acta acustica united with Acustica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact