John E. Kicza

36 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

John E. Kicza
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 97
  • Anthropology 100
  • Demography 108
  • Cultural Studies 52
  • History 32
Replace William L. Sherman with:
William L. Sherman United States
Brian R. Hamnett United Kingdom
André Saint-Lu
Lyle N. McAlister United States
Ènrique Tandeter Argentina
Frank F. Conlon United States
Erick D. Langer United States
Thomas F. McGann United States
Howard F. Cline United States
Arthur P. Whitaker United States
John E. Kicza relative to William L. Sherman United States William L. Sherman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
William L. Sherman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Kicza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Kicza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Kicza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Kicza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Kicza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Kicza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Kicza. The network helps show where John E. Kicza may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John E. Kicza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Kicza Line = papers co-authored together John E. Kicza links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199551
2 198533
3 198431
4 200129
5 199423
6 198220
7 198720
8 199519
9
Empresarios coloniales : familias y negocios en la ciudad de México durante los borbones
198613
10 198013
11 198212
12 199310
13 19849
14 19959
15 19956
16 19926
17 19956
18 19855
19 19885
20 19964

About John E. Kicza

John E. Kicza is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Demography, Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American history and culture (18 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (15 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Mexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics (4 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers), Cuban History and Society (3 papers) and Politics and Society in Latin America (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (97 citations), Anthropology (100 citations), Demography (108 citations), Cultural Studies (52 citations) and History (32 citations). John E. Kicza has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric Van Young, Susan Deans‐Smith, Elinor G. K. Melville, Susan Migden Socolow, Susan M. Deeds, Richard J. Salvucci, Frances Karttunen, Mark Thurner, Louise M. Burkhart and Rebecca Horn. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History, The American Historical Review, Ethnohistory and The William and Mary Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact