John E. Hofferberth

855 citations
27 papers · 609 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Hofferberth

27 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

John E. Hofferberth
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Insect Science 283
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 192
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 143
  • Genetics 202
  • Organic Chemistry 166
Replace Pierre Zagatti with:
Pierre Zagatti France
C. J. Persoons Netherlands
Frank Schröder Germany
Xiaoqing Hou China
Fergus G.P. Earley United Kingdom
John Weatherston Canada
M. D. Chisholm Canada
Michal Hoskovec Czechia
Marie Bengtsson Sweden
Kazushi Koga Japan
John E. Hofferberth relative to Pierre Zagatti France Pierre Zagatti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Pierre Zagatti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Hofferberth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Hofferberth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Hofferberth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Hofferberth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Hofferberth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Hofferberth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Hofferberth. The network helps show where John E. Hofferberth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Hofferberth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Hofferberth Line = papers co-authored together John E. Hofferberth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015127
2 201774
3 201353
4 201048
5 200033
6 201233
7 200332
8 201530
9 201824
10 201318
11 199914
12 200213
13 200413
14 201613
15 200312
16 201811
17 201910
18 20239
19 20019
20 20208

About John E. Hofferberth

John E. Hofferberth is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Organic Chemistry, Genetics and Oncology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (283 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (192 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (143 citations), Genetics (202 citations) and Organic Chemistry (166 citations). John E. Hofferberth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Joachim Rüther, Leo A. Paquette, Johannes Stökl, Tamara Pokorny, Joel S. Beckett, Ingmar Weiß, Hany K. M. Dweck, Markus Knaden, Shimaa A. M. Ebrahim and Judith C. Gallucci. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Scientific Reports, Organic Letters, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact