Ingmar Weiß
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 9
- Insect and Pesticide Research 3
- Genetics 9
- Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies 6
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy 3
- Co-authors
- Jörg Müller (8 shared papers)Claus Bässler (7 shared papers)Sebastian Seibold (5 shared papers)Simon Thorn (6 shared papers)Joachim Rüther (3 shared papers)Petr Baldrián (2 shared papers)John E. Hofferberth (2 shared papers)Johannes Stökl (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (4 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Ecological Monographs (1 paper)BioMed Research International (1 paper)Zootaxa (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Ingmar Weiß
18 papers receiving 414 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Insect Science 267
- Ecological Modeling 55
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 171
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 90
- Ecology 150
Countries citing papers authored by Ingmar Weiß
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingmar Weiß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingmar Weiß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingmar Weiß more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingmar Weiß
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingmar Weiß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingmar Weiß. The network helps show where Ingmar Weiß may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingmar Weiß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 0 |
About Ingmar Weiß
Ingmar Weiß is a scholar working on Insect Science, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (3 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (267 citations), Ecological Modeling (55 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (171 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (90 citations) and Ecology (150 citations). Ingmar Weiß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jörg Müller, Claus Bässler, Sebastian Seibold, Simon Thorn, Joachim Rüther, Petr Baldrián, John E. Hofferberth, Johannes Stökl, Kerri T. Vierling and R. Brandl. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Nature Communications, Ecological Monographs, BioMed Research International and Zootaxa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.