John E. Floyd

459 citations
29 papers · 246 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Floyd

24 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

John E. Floyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 89
  • Finance 53
  • Economics and Econometrics 151
  • Soil Science 46
Replace Robert N. Collender with:
Robert N. Collender United States
Ewa Rabinowicz Sweden
Greg Peters United Kingdom
Ramon L. Clarete Philippines
Raisuddin Ahmed United States
Mary Keeney Ireland
Dean A. DeRosa United States
Dany Jaimovich Germany
Partha Sen India
Vidyāsthān Paṇtuaḥ Paṇtāl niṅ Srāvjrāv Ṭoempī Qabhivaḍḍhaṅ Kambujā
John E. Floyd relative to Robert N. Collender United States Robert N. Collender's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Robert N. Collender · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Floyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Floyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Floyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Floyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Floyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Floyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Floyd. The network helps show where John E. Floyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John E. Floyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Floyd Line = papers co-authored together John E. Floyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1965134
2
International Capital Movements and Monetary Equilibrium: Reply
196920
3 199111
4 19949
5 20028
6 19788
7 20097
8 19896
9 19795
10 19785
11 19694
12 19784
13 19794
14 19683
15 19972
16 19942
17 20092
18 19782
19 19952
20 19652

About John E. Floyd

John E. Floyd is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Accounting, having authored 29 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (15 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (14 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (9 papers), Economic theories and models (6 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers) and Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (112 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (89 citations), Finance (53 citations), Economics and Econometrics (151 citations) and Soil Science (46 citations). John E. Floyd has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Allan Hynes, Jack L. Carr, George H. Borts, Lawrence Schembri and D. P. Pope. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, Journal of money credit and banking, Journal of Political Economy, Scandinavian Journal of Economics and European Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact