John E. Estes

2.2k citations
45 papers · 1.6k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Estes

41 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John E. Estes
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Ecological Modeling 291
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 460
  • Geography, Planning and Development 186
  • Global and Planetary Change 563
  • Ecology 603
Replace David V. Pullar with:
David V. Pullar Australia
E. LeDrew Canada
Laurent Durieux France
Raymond L. Czaplewski United States
David Sheeren France
Stephen L. Egbert United States
DAVID C. HOWARD United Kingdom
P.F. Fisher United Kingdom
Myroslava Lesiv Austria
André Zerger Australia
John E. Estes relative to David V. Pullar Australia David V. Pullar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
David V. Pullar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Estes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Estes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Estes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Estes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Estes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Estes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Estes. The network helps show where John E. Estes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Estes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Estes Line = papers co-authored together John E. Estes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001485
2 1991288
3 1987193
4 199099
5 198784
6 198467
7 198537
8 198731
9 198929
10 198026
11 198625
12 197024
13 197521
14 198021
15 198616
16 200116
17 202116
18 199415
19 196614
20 198512

About John E. Estes

John E. Estes is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Pollution, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing in Agriculture (7 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (5 papers), Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (291 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (460 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (186 citations), Global and Planetary Change (563 citations) and Ecology (603 citations). John E. Estes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Star, James M. Scott, Frank W. Davis, Craig R. Groves, R. Gerald Wright, Blair Csuti, James D. Jacobi, Daniel B. Botkin, Joseph Scepan and Terence R. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Geocarto International, The Professional Geographer, Journal of Field Archaeology, Ecological Applications and BioScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact