John E. Dove

46 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John E. Dove
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 516
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 475
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 496
  • Applied Mathematics 191
  • Spectroscopy 148
Replace Edward F. Greene with:
Edward F. Greene United States
Leslie J. Kirsch United Kingdom
Zaka I. Slawsky United States
Wilhelm Groth Germany
C.J.S.M. Simpson United Kingdom
Y. T. Lee United States
Newman De Haas United States
J. D. Lambert United Kingdom
Robert L. Sharpless United States
Graham Black United States
John E. Dove relative to Edward F. Greene United States Edward F. Greene's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Edward F. Greene · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Dove

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Dove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Dove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Dove more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Dove

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Dove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Dove. The network helps show where John E. Dove may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Dove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Dove Line = papers co-authored together John E. Dove links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974115
2 197387
3 198582
4 197975
5 199266
6 197152
7 198752
8 199143
9 197840
10 197840
11 198038
12 197237
13 197437
14 198337
15 198636
16 198434
17 196533
18 197933
19 196932
20 198627

About John E. Dove

John E. Dove is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Applied Mathematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (18 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (16 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (13 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (6 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (5 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (5 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (516 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (475 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (496 citations), Applied Mathematics (191 citations) and Spectroscopy (148 citations). John E. Dove has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heshel Teitelbaum, Wing S. Nip, Thomas C. Clark, Juergen H. Troe, Peter H. Cribb, Margot E. Mandy, H. Hippler, Satoshi Yamazaki, Peter G. Martin and J. Warnatz. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Chemistry, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics, The Astrophysical Journal and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact