John E. Cort

440 citations
43 papers · 223 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Cort

33 papers receiving 161 citations

Peers

John E. Cort
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Religious studies 108
  • Anthropology 101
  • Philosophy 98
  • Political Science and International Relations 53
  • Geography, Planning and Development 11
Replace James W. Laine with:
James W. Laine United States
Charlotte Elisheva Fonrobert United States
Galit Hasan‐Rokem Israel
Boniface Ramsey
Aaron W. Hughes United States
Daphne Hampson United Kingdom
Richard G. Newhauser United States
Stephen C. Berkwitz United States
Nick Nesbitt United States
Mikeal C. Parsons United States
John E. Cort relative to James W. Laine United States James W. Laine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
James W. Laine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Cort

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Cort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Cort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Cort more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Cort

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Cort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Cort. The network helps show where John E. Cort may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside John E. Cort, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Cort Line = papers co-authored together John E. Cort links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200132
2 200228
3 200417
4 200214
5 199412
6 201212
7 199012
8
Scripture and Community: Collected Essays on the Jains
199312
9 199511
10 20159
11
Framing the Jina: narratives of icons and idols in Jain history
20108
12 19968
13 19957
14 19874
15 20024
16 20013
17 19913
18
Desert temples : sacred centers of Rajasthan in historical, art-historical, and social context
20082
19 20062
20 20062

About John E. Cort

John E. Cort is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (25 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (23 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (7 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (4 papers) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (108 citations), Anthropology (101 citations), Philosophy (98 citations), Political Science and International Relations (53 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (11 citations). John E. Cort has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James C. Laidlaw, Lawrence A. Babb, Arvind Sharma and Philip A. Lutgendorf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Indian Philosophy, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Contributions to Indian Sociology, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion and Numen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact