John Donecker

15 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

John Donecker
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Equine 86
  • Small Animals 158
  • Parasitology 55
  • Animal Science and Zoology 51
  • Molecular Medicine 17
Replace Nathalie Foucher with:
Nathalie Foucher France
Bart Sustronck Belgium
Laurie A. Beard United States
Shebl E. Salem Egypt
Bruce G. McLaughlin United States
Maristela Silveira Palhares Brazil
Karen Coumbe United Kingdom
Deborah Amodie United States
Edwina Wilkes Australia
Kevin E. Washburn United States
John Donecker relative to Nathalie Foucher France Nathalie Foucher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Nathalie Foucher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Donecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Donecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Donecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Donecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Donecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Donecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Donecker. The network helps show where John Donecker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Donecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Donecker Line = papers co-authored together John Donecker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201470
2 201242
3 198428
4 201520
5
Blood chemical abnormalities in cattle with ruptured bladders and ruptured urethras.
198220
6 201517
7 201114
8 198313
9 201612
10 20169
11 19867
12 20216
13 20214
14 20212
15 20161
16 20230

About John Donecker

John Donecker is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery, Animal Science and Zoology, Equine and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helminth infection and control (6 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (5 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (3 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (86 citations), Small Animals (158 citations), Parasitology (55 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (51 citations) and Molecular Medicine (17 citations). John Donecker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Martin K. Nielsen, DM Leathwick, Craig R. Reinemeyer, Ray M. Kaplan, Alan A. Marchiondo, James E. C. Bellamy, L. R. BRAMLAGE, A. A. GABEL, P. B. Fretz and Stephen M. Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Parasitology, Equine Veterinary Journal, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Health Physics and Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact