John Daniel Williams

671 citations
13 papers · 391 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Daniel Williams

13 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

John Daniel Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 298
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 51
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 28
  • Environmental Chemistry 7
  • Soil Science 10
Replace S. Blake with:
S. Blake United Kingdom
James C. Armstrong United States
D. J. M. Kester Netherlands
Alexander V. Yushchenko Ukraine
V. M. Lyuty Russia
J. Zsargó United States
C. Sneden United States
III Gautier T. N. United States
Bradley J. Armosky United States
T. Lim United Kingdom
John Daniel Williams relative to S. Blake United Kingdom S. Blake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
S. Blake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Daniel Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Daniel Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Daniel Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Daniel Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Daniel Williams. The network helps show where John Daniel Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Daniel Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Daniel Williams Line = papers co-authored together John Daniel Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2010210
2 200640
3 200536
4 200835
5 199821
6 200118
7 20029
8 20069
9 19737
10 19743
11 19821
12
The ion composition of Saturn's magnetosphere
20081
13
"The Imperial March" (Darth Vader's Theme) from The Empire Strikes Back
20141

About John Daniel Williams

John Daniel Williams is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Music, Finance and Statistics and Probability, having authored 13 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (6 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (3 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (1 paper), Soil erosion and sediment transport (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Applications (1 paper), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (298 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (51 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (28 citations), Environmental Chemistry (7 citations) and Soil Science (10 citations). John Daniel Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Reisenfeld, Michelle Thomsen, D. Delapp, Robert L. Tokar, David Young, F. J. Crary, Edward C Sittler Jr, D. A. Gurnett, William S. Kurth and Michele Dougherty. Their work appears in journals such as Geophysical Research Letters, Physics of Plasmas, Annales Geophysicae, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact