John C.W. Comley

32 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers

John C.W. Comley
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Parasitology 109
  • Infectious Diseases 227
  • Aging 19
  • Small Animals 69
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 97
Replace Mitchell Fry with:
Mitchell Fry United Kingdom
James V. Pivnichny United States
Rohit Shukla India
Alicia M. Hanson United States
Kaoru Kondo Japan
Mark L. Cunningham United States
Robin D. Couch United States
B. Kaye United Kingdom
Mohd Akif India
Vladimı́r Kubı́ček Czechia
John C.W. Comley relative to Mitchell Fry United Kingdom Mitchell Fry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Mitchell Fry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C.W. Comley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C.W. Comley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C.W. Comley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C.W. Comley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C.W. Comley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C.W. Comley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C.W. Comley. The network helps show where John C.W. Comley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C.W. Comley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C.W. Comley Line = papers co-authored together John C.W. Comley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990104
2 1989102
3 199698
4
The further application of MTT-formazan colorimetry to studies on filarial worm viability.
198943
5 200441
6
New macrofilaricidal leads from plants?
199028
7 199125
8 198524
9 198123
10 199516
11 199014
12 198313
13 198913
14 199512
15 198012
16 199712
17
In vitro assessment of the activity of anthelmintic compounds on adults of Onchocerca volvulus.
199012
18 198111
19 198910
20 19869

About John C.W. Comley

John C.W. Comley is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Small Animals, Ecology and Epidemiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (13 papers), Helminth infection and control (6 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (6 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (5 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (5 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (109 citations), Infectious Diseases (227 citations), Aging (19 citations), Small Animals (69 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (97 citations). John C.W. Comley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mike Rees, David C. Jenkins, Julian J. Jaffe, Jeremy N. Stables, Simon Townson, David J. Livingstone, Karamjit S. Jandu, A. O'Dowd, David L. Selwood and Alan T. Hudson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Parasitology, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Parasitology and SLAS DISCOVERY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact