John Cluverius

563 citations
20 papers · 286 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Cluverius

18 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

John Cluverius
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Communication 86
  • Public Administration 32
  • Political Science and International Relations 162
  • Strategy and Management 95
  • Sociology and Political Science 121
Replace Laurent Bernhard with:
Laurent Bernhard Switzerland
Antonio López Pina United States
Ben Seyd United Kingdom
Daniel Q. Gillion United States
Alexander Caviedes United States
Patrik Öhberg Sweden
Ulrich Willems Germany
Erin Tolley Canada
Mauro P. Porto United States
Party Financing
John Cluverius relative to Laurent Bernhard Switzerland Laurent Bernhard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Laurent Bernhard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Cluverius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Cluverius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Cluverius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Cluverius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Cluverius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Cluverius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Cluverius. The network helps show where John Cluverius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Cluverius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Cluverius Line = papers co-authored together John Cluverius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201884
2 200557
3 201425
4 201720
5 201519
6 201217
7 202115
8 20139
9 20209
10 20208
11 20186
12 20216
13
Explaining the Anomalous Growth of Public Sector Lobbying in the American States, 1997-2007
20115
14 20182
15 20221
16 20231
17 20191
18 20191
19 20250
20 20250

About John Cluverius

John Cluverius is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration and Communication, having authored 20 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (11 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (2 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (86 citations), Public Administration (32 citations), Political Science and International Relations (162 citations), Strategy and Management (95 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (121 citations). John Cluverius has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kevin K. Banda, Virginia Gray, David Lowery, Steven Livingston, Sean Aday, Jeffrey J. Harden, Boris Shor, Rebecca Stone, Kelly M. Socia and Wilson R. Palacios. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Quarterly, American Politics Research, Justice Quarterly, State Politics & Policy Quarterly and Publius The Journal of Federalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact