John Clements

79 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John Clements
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Software 234
  • Computer Science Applications 237
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 272
  • Hardware and Architecture 150
  • Clinical Psychology 266
Replace James W. Moore with:
James W. Moore United States
Jane Alty United Kingdom
Hua‐Hua Chang United States
David B. Lowe Australia
Ken Wood United Kingdom
Manuel J. Fernández Iglesias Spain
Kevin Leach United States
Zhihong Zeng China
Louis A. Roussos United States
Michael Clarke United Kingdom
John Clements relative to James W. Moore United States James W. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
James W. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Clements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Clements's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Clements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clements. The network helps show where John Clements may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Clements, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Clements Line = papers co-authored together John Clements links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984319
2 2002232
3 1986111
4 201289
5 199784
6 198958
7 200154
8 201253
9 200946
10 197445
11 201244
12 201243
13 200440
14
Proceedings of the Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop
200938
15 199037
16 200534
17 198033
18 200431
19 199531
20 199926

About John Clements

John Clements is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Software, Media Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (12 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (9 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (7 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (6 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (234 citations), Computer Science Applications (237 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (272 citations), Hardware and Architecture (150 citations) and Clinical Psychology (266 citations). John Clements has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Felleisen, B. Milan Horáček, Matthew Flatt, David S. Janzen, Shriram Krishnamurthi, Robert Bruce Findler, Gary E. Dunn, Lucy C. Wing, Paul A. Steckler and Cormac Flanagan. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Child Care Health and Development, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Optimal Control Applications and Methods and Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact