John Clements

76 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John Clements
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Software 196
  • Computer Science Applications 205
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 236
  • Hardware and Architecture 117
  • Clinical Psychology 251
Replace James W. Moore with:
James W. Moore United States
Jane Alty United Kingdom
Hua‐Hua Chang United States
Judith A. Spray United States
David Lowe Australia
Kevin Leach United States
Daniel J. Bernstein United States
Merrick L. Furst United States
Jason Freeman United States
Christof Lutteroth New Zealand
John Clements relative to James W. Moore United States James W. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
James W. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Clements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Clements's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Clements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clements. The network helps show where John Clements may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Clements, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Clements Line = papers co-authored together John Clements links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984293
2 2002184
3 1986100
4 199779
5 201276
6 201251
7 198950
8 200944
9 197441
10
Proceedings of the Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop
200935
11 200434
12 198033
13 201233
14 199033
15 201231
16 199529
17 200428
18 200527
19 199924
20 197522

About John Clements

John Clements is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications and Media Technology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (10 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (9 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (196 citations), Computer Science Applications (205 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (236 citations), Hardware and Architecture (117 citations) and Clinical Psychology (251 citations). John Clements has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. Milan Horáček, Matthias Felleisen, David S. Janzen, Shriram Krishnamurthi, Robert Bruce Findler, Matthew Flatt, Gary E. Dunn, L. Wing, Paul Steckler and Cormac Flanagan. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Child Care Health and Development, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy and ACM SIGPLAN Notices.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact