John Clem

2.5k citations
72 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

John Clem

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John Clem
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 425
  • Atmospheric Science 388
  • Radiation 145
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 300
Replace P. A. Evenson with:
P. A. Evenson United States
M. L. Duldig Australia
R. Pyle United States
K. O’Brien United States
John W. Bieber United States
Devendra Lal United States
E. P. Ney United States
G. Cini Castagnoli Italy
Alexander Mishev Finland
G. F. Herzog United States
John Clem relative to P. A. Evenson United States P. A. Evenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
P. A. Evenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Clem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Clem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Clem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clem. The network helps show where John Clem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Clem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Clem Line = papers co-authored together John Clem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005256
2 2000195
3 200567
4 201061
5 200057
6 200057
7 200647
8 201345
9 200644
10 201042
11 201639
12 200839
13 201637
14 201437
15 200431
16 200431
17 200026
18 201525
19
Largest GLE in Half a Century: Neutron Monitor Observations of the January 20, 2005 Event
200524
20 201823

About John Clem

John Clem is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (53 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (30 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (21 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (19 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (10 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (9 papers), Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics (7 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (425 citations), Atmospheric Science (388 citations), Radiation (145 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (300 citations). John Clem has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P. A. Evenson, Л. И. Дорман, R. Pyle, J. W. Bieber, M. L. Duldig, J. E. Humble, John W. Bieber, D. Ruffolo, A. Sáiz and Nathaniel A. Lifton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal, Geophysical Research Letters, Space Weather and Advances in Space Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact