John Clancy

5.9k citations
150 papers · 3.4k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

John Clancy

137 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

John Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.2k
  • Sensory Systems 159
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 396
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 308
  • Research and Theory 18
Replace Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen with:
Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen Denmark
Manfred Rauh Germany
Richard Payne United States
Aihua Lin China
Motomu Suga Japan
Kentaro Hatano Japan
Toyojiro Matsuishi Japan
Stephen Quinn Australia
Darrell G. Kirch United States
Julie Williams United Kingdom
John Clancy relative to Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen Denmark Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clancy. The network helps show where John Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Clancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Clancy Line = papers co-authored together John Clancy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 150 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009238
2 2005163
3 2001162
4 2013147
5 1986126
6 197893
7 199291
8 201787
9 200082
10 201877
11 201675
12 200765
13 201961
14 201461
15 202156
16 202255
17 201053
18 197349
19 201348
20 201446

About John Clancy

John Clancy is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy, having authored 150 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (49 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (14 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (9 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (8 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k citations), Sensory Systems (159 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (396 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (308 citations) and Research and Theory (18 citations). John Clancy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrew McVicar, Russell Noyes, Rhonda D. Szczesniak, R Noyes, Steven M. Rowe, James Reich, Thomas W. O’Gorman, George Winokur, David M. Bird and Zsuzsa Bebők. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, PLoS ONE, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Comprehensive Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact