John Cadwell

6 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

John Cadwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Neurology 191
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 83
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 73
  • Biomedical Engineering 112
Replace Ph Ellaway with:
Ph Ellaway United Kingdom
A. Ricamato United States
R. Mariorenzi Italy
A. Polo Italy
J Stephen Australia
Yasunori Fuchigami Japan
Leila Cohen Argentina
Natalia Alexeeva United States
Jean‐Marc Aimonetti France
Yoshikazu Ugawa Japan
John Cadwell relative to Ph Ellaway United Kingdom Ph Ellaway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ph Ellaway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Cadwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Cadwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Cadwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Cadwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Cadwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Cadwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Cadwell. The network helps show where John Cadwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Cadwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Cadwell Line = papers co-authored together John Cadwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1990140
2 198879
3 199443
4 199641
5 199317
6
Magnetoelectric stimulation of human motor cortex: normal values and potential safety issues in spinal cord injury.
199012

About John Cadwell

John Cadwell is a scholar working on Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Spinal Cord Injury Research (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (191 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (83 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (73 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (112 citations). John Cadwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Vahé E. Amassian, Walter J. Levy, P.J. Maccabee, Roger Q. Cracco, Bradley J. Roth, L. Eberle, Mark Hallett, Giorgio Anselmi, Guy Hotson and Karl H. Kraus. Their work appears in journals such as Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, Brain Research and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact