John C. Vance
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 6
- Migration, Health and Trauma 4
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 1
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 2
- Co-authors
- Jake M. Najman (6 shared papers)M. John Thearle (4 shared papers)Frances M. Boyle (4 shared papers)I B Pless (2 shared papers)Betty Satterwhite (1 shared paper)M. Esther McClain (1 shared paper)Frances Boyle (1 shared paper)William Trufant Foster (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Medical Journal of Australia (2 papers)Social Science & Medicine (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (1 paper)PEDIATRICS (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
John C. Vance
11 papers receiving 400 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 323
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 43
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 155
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 101
- Health 27
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Vance
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Vance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Vance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Vance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Vance
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Vance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Vance. The network helps show where John C. Vance may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside John C. Vance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 111 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 86 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 62 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 6 |
About John C. Vance
John C. Vance is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (323 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (43 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (155 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (101 citations) and Health (27 citations). John C. Vance has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jake M. Najman, M. John Thearle, Frances M. Boyle, I B Pless, Betty Satterwhite, M. Esther McClain, Frances Boyle and William Trufant Foster. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Social Science & Medicine, The Lancet, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.