John Bowering

441 citations
12 papers · 315 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Bowering

12 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

John Bowering
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 110
  • Developmental Neuroscience 59
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 63
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 222
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
Replace Douglas Boyd with:
Douglas Boyd United States
Waraporn Chau-In Thailand
Julia Probert United States
Robert H. Bode United States
Mark D. Willingham United States
Luc‐Marie Jacquet Belgium
Dagmar Kaiser United States
Rosanne Sheinberg United States
Aveek Jayant India
Christopher F. Tirotta United States
John Bowering relative to Douglas Boyd United States Douglas Boyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Douglas Boyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bowering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bowering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bowering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bowering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bowering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bowering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bowering. The network helps show where John Bowering may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bowering, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bowering Line = papers co-authored together John Bowering links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199995
2 201439
3 201535
4 201233
5 200830
6 199130
7 200920
8 201412
9 201410
10 20109
11 20101
12 19901

About John Bowering

John Bowering is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (110 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (59 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (63 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (222 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations). John Bowering has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Schwarz, Alasdair M. Barr, Lurdes Tse, Hilton Ling, James G. Abel, Christopher Thompson, S. Lichtenstein, Otto A. Smiseth, Robert J. Hudson and Michael A. Frais. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Current Neuropharmacology and Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact