Julia Probert

453 citations
11 papers · 290 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Probert

8 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Julia Probert
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 160
  • Developmental Neuroscience 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 37
  • Neurology 42
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 61
Replace Puja Shankar with:
Puja Shankar United States
Julie Wyrobek United States
Helena Claesson Lingehall Sweden
Jae‐Woo Ju South Korea
Esther M. Wesselink Netherlands
Ungkab Prakanrattana Thailand
John Bowering Canada
D. Parente Portugal
Waraporn Chau-In Thailand
Victor De Castro France
Julia Probert relative to Puja Shankar United States Puja Shankar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Puja Shankar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Probert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Probert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Probert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Probert. The network helps show where Julia Probert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Probert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Probert Line = papers co-authored together Julia Probert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2018126
2 2019115
3 202220
4 202111
5 201910
6 20175
7 20222
8 20201
9 20250
10 20220
11 20140

About Julia Probert

Julia Probert is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology and Applied Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (160 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (58 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (37 citations), Neurology (42 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (61 citations). Julia Probert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karin J. Neufeld, Charles H. Brown, Jing Tian, Kaushik Mandal, Charles W. Hogue, Kenton J. Zehr, Yohei Nomura, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Michelle Burke Parish and Vidyulata Kamath. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Medicine, Scientific Reports and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact