Julia Probert
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Papers in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 7
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 4
- Co-authors
- Karin J. Neufeld (5 shared papers)Kaushik Mandal (3 shared papers)Charles H. Brown (3 shared papers)Jing Tian (3 shared papers)Charles W. Hogue (4 shared papers)Kenton J. Zehr (2 shared papers)Atsushi Yamaguchi (2 shared papers)Yohei Nomura (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Anesthesiology (2 papers)Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Psychosomatic Research (1 paper)Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Julia Probert
8 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 187
- Developmental Neuroscience 127
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 93
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 131
- Neurology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Probert
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Probert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Probert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Probert. The network helps show where Julia Probert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Probert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 121 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 |
About Julia Probert
Julia Probert is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (1 paper) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (187 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (127 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (93 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (131 citations) and Neurology (56 citations). Julia Probert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karin J. Neufeld, Kaushik Mandal, Charles H. Brown, Jing Tian, Charles W. Hogue, Kenton J. Zehr, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Yohei Nomura, Vidyulata Kamath and Michelle Burke Parish. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Scientific Reports, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.