John Borrie

978 citations
45 papers · 715 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

John Borrie

44 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

John Borrie
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Gastroenterology 107
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 221
  • Surgery 302
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 75
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 3
Replace K. Jeyasingham with:
K. Jeyasingham United Kingdom
Rowan Nicks Australia
Lewis H. Bosher United States
Nsidinanya Okike United States
Irwin S. Johnsrude United States
Kuldeep Teja United States
Ingvar Dahl Sweden
Earl F. Wolfman United States
RE Koehler United States
John O. F. Roehm United States
John Borrie relative to K. Jeyasingham United Kingdom K. Jeyasingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
K. Jeyasingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Borrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Borrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Borrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Borrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Borrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Borrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Borrie. The network helps show where John Borrie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Borrie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Borrie Line = papers co-authored together John Borrie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197689
2 196554
3 198050
4 197043
5 198143
6 197438
7 197031
8
Primary carcinoma of the bronchus; prognosis following surgical resection; a clinico-pathological study of 200 patients.
195229
9 197327
10 196223
11 197323
12 196421
13 196521
14 196020
15 196520
16 196518
17 195317
18 197617
19 195514
20 19599

About John Borrie

John Borrie is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (6 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (3 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (3 papers) and Parasitic infections in humans and animals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (107 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (221 citations), Surgery (302 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (75 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (3 citations). John Borrie has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Ivan Lichter, Hiram T. Langston, M.A. Gemmell, B. William Manktelow, John B. Blennerhassett, Richard W. Bunton, G L Hill and J. E. Caughey. Their work appears in journals such as Thorax, British journal of surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Academic Medicine and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact