John Booth

24 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers

John Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pharmacology 364
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 135
  • Rehabilitation 40
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 13
  • Occupational Therapy 24
Replace Clint T. Miller with:
Clint T. Miller Australia
Corey B. Simon United States
Max Zusman Australia
B. Kim Humphreys Switzerland
Pablo Herrero Spain
Hayley B. Leake Australia
Martha Funabashi Canada
Eva Rasmussen-Barr Sweden
Martin Rabey Australia
Mieke Dolphens Belgium
John Booth relative to Clint T. Miller Australia Clint T. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Clint T. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Booth. The network helps show where John Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Booth Line = papers co-authored together John Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017270
2 2021114
3 201483
4 201479
5 201872
6 200344
7 201735
8 202127
9 201625
10 202022
11 202221
12
Elective induction of labour: a controlled study.
197016
13 202014
14 202211
15 20239
16 20169
17 20208
18 20226
19 20214
20 20143

About John Booth

John Booth is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Rheumatology, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (1 paper) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (364 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (135 citations), Rehabilitation (40 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (13 citations) and Occupational Therapy (24 citations). John Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matthew D. Jones, Aidan G Cashin, G. Lorimer Moseley, Markus Hübscher, Marcus Schiltenwolf, Michael P.A. Davies, Janet L. Taylor, Daina L. Sturnieks, Belinda Parmenter and Michael A. Wewege. Their work appears in journals such as Musculoskeletal Care, Pain Medicine, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of Pain and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact