John Blake

2.3k citations
56 papers · 1.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Blake

50 papers receiving 1.4k citations

John Blake's Hit Papers

The Propulsion of Mucus by Cilia 1988 · 456 citations
4560+12+25Years since publication100200300400

Peers

John Blake
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Condensed Matter Physics 411
  • Computational Mechanics 273
  • Biomedical Engineering 477
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 231
  • Materials Chemistry 285
Replace N. Liron with:
N. Liron Israel
Ricardo Cortez United States
Kaye S. Morgan Australia
Masaharu Tanemura Japan
Robert Dillon United States
Paulo E. Arratia United States
Masaharu Nagayama Japan
Andrej Vilfan Slovenia
Peter Garik United States
R. Besseling Netherlands
John Blake relative to N. Liron Israel N. Liron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
N. Liron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Blake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Blake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Blake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Blake. The network helps show where John Blake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Blake Line = papers co-authored together John Blake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Propulsion of Mucus by Cilia
Hit paper breakdown →
1988456
2 1974202
3 1972175
4 1999137
5 200797
6 200363
7 201958
8 200257
9 201233
10 197330
11 202127
12 202322
13 197420
14 200118
15 202014
16
201612
17 200110
18 202210
19 20187
20 20226

About John Blake

John Blake is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Condensed Matter Physics, Language and Linguistics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (10 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (9 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (5 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (411 citations), Computational Mechanics (273 citations), Biomedical Engineering (477 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (231 citations) and Materials Chemistry (285 citations). John Blake has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Sleigh, N. Liron, Andrew J. Szeri, Giles S. Keen, Olgert Lindau, Michael L. Calvisi, Maxim Mozgovoy, Brian D. Storey, Michala E. Pettitt and B. S. C. Leadbeater. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, IEEE Access, Physics of Fluids, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences and Journal of Educational Computing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact