John Blake

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

John Blake's Hit Papers

The Propulsion of Mucus by Cilia 1988 · 413 citations
4130+12+25Years since publication100200300400

Peers

John Blake
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Condensed Matter Physics 360
  • Computational Mechanics 252
  • Biomedical Engineering 443
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 214
  • Materials Chemistry 268
Replace N. Liron with:
N. Liron Israel
Masaharu Tanemura Japan
Masaharu Nagayama Japan
Andrej Vilfan Slovenia
Yongsam Kim South Korea
Massimiliano Rossi Germany
Robert Dillon United States
Kaye S. Morgan Australia
Ricardo Cortez United States
Alexander Groisman United States
John Blake relative to N. Liron Israel N. Liron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
N. Liron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Blake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Blake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Blake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Blake. The network helps show where John Blake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Blake Line = papers co-authored together John Blake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Propulsion of Mucus by Cilia
Hit paper breakdown →
1988413
2 1974183
3 1972153
4 1999135
5 200788
6 200361
7 201950
8 200249
9 201232
10 197326
11 202125
12 202319
13 197419
14 200110
15 20227
16 20196
17 20206
18 20244
19 20224
20 20184

About John Blake

John Blake is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Biomedical Engineering and Language and Linguistics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Micro and Nano Robotics (9 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (4 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (4 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (360 citations), Computational Mechanics (252 citations), Biomedical Engineering (443 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (214 citations) and Materials Chemistry (268 citations). John Blake has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Sleigh, N. Liron, Andrew J. Szeri, Giles S. Keen, Olgert Lindau, Michael L. Calvisi, Maxim Mozgovoy, A. Pearson, Brian D. Storey and B. S. C. Leadbeater. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, Journal of Theoretical Biology, IEEE Access, Physics of Fluids and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact