John A. Wolfe

19 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

John A. Wolfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Ophthalmology 74
  • Transplantation 21
  • Dermatology 43
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 69
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 55
Replace Thomas C. Lee with:
Thomas C. Lee United States
Kiyoshi Onishi Japan
A. Banić Switzerland
Erhan Çapkın Türkiye
Kwang Seog Kim South Korea
George B. Irons United States
Jonathan P. Hayter United Kingdom
Ming-Chung Yeh Taiwan
Antonio Tullio Italy
Gregory R. D. Evans United States
John A. Wolfe relative to Thomas C. Lee United States Thomas C. Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Thomas C. Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Wolfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Wolfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Wolfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Wolfe. The network helps show where John A. Wolfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John A. Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Wolfe Line = papers co-authored together John A. Wolfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1986119
2 198955
3 201738
4 198530
5 198729
6
Detection of lymphocytes in endomyocardium using immunohistochemical techniques. Relevance to evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies in suspected cases of lymphocytic myocarditis
198627
7 198727
8 198922
9 198918
10 198413
11 198713
12 20019
13 19838
14 19807
15 20173
16 19703
17 19853
18 19933
19 19891

About John A. Wolfe

John A. Wolfe is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Whipple's Disease and Interleukins (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper) and Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (74 citations), Transplantation (21 citations), Dermatology (43 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (69 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (55 citations). John A. Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Scott McCarty, Ronald E. Riefkohl, Edwin Burk Cox, Peter C. Kolbeck, Charles Steenbergen, David J. Pettitt, William C. Knowler, Mark B. Horton, Peter H. Bennett and James L. Burchette. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Documenta Ophthalmologica, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact