Johan Ellenius

579 citations
21 papers · 457 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Ellenius

19 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Johan Ellenius
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Health Information Management 179
  • Toxicology 89
  • Health Informatics 23
  • Emergency Medical Services 57
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
Replace Fernando Lopes with:
Fernando Lopes Portugal
Lisa Pizziferri United States
Atif Zafar United States
Heba H Edrees United States
Sevan Dulgarian United States
Alejandra Salazar United States
Zoe Co United States
Sarah C. Nosal United States
Beatriz H. Rocha United States
John D. McGreevey United States
Johan Ellenius relative to Fernando Lopes Portugal Fernando Lopes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Fernando Lopes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Ellenius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Ellenius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Ellenius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Ellenius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Ellenius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Ellenius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Ellenius. The network helps show where Johan Ellenius may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Ellenius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Ellenius Line = papers co-authored together Johan Ellenius links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200971
2 201969
3 199751
4 200650
5 201027
6 202024
7 200822
8 202020
9 201718
10 202017
11 201316
12 200815
13 200013
14 200013
15
Neural network analysis of biochemical markers for early assessment of acute myocardial infarction.
19979
16 20078
17 20177
18 20255
19 20262
20 19970

About Johan Ellenius

Johan Ellenius is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Toxicology, Emergency Medical Services, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (7 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (6 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (1 paper), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (179 citations), Toxicology (89 citations), Health Informatics (23 citations), Emergency Medical Services (57 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations). Johan Ellenius has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Iran and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Torgny Groth, Bertil Lindahl, Uno Fors, Shahram Tofighi, Lars C. Wallentin, Aref Salehi, Tomas Bergvall, Carrie E. Pierce, G. Niklas Norén and Mikael Dellborg. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Safety, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Medical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact