Joel Lavinsky

39 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Joel Lavinsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Sensory Systems 176
  • Otorhinolaryngology 45
  • Speech and Hearing 42
  • Neurology 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 76
Replace R.J.H. Ensink with:
R.J.H. Ensink Netherlands
Debra Wilmington United States
Roberta Anzivino Italy
Jaime Marco Spain
Charlotte M. Chiong Philippines
Magdalena B. Skarżyńska Poland
Mutsumi Kenmochi Japan
John‐Martin Hempel Germany
Luíz Lavinsky Brazil
Antonio Ventura Spain
Joel Lavinsky relative to R.J.H. Ensink Netherlands R.J.H. Ensink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R.J.H. Ensink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joel Lavinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joel Lavinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel Lavinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel Lavinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joel Lavinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel Lavinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel Lavinsky. The network helps show where Joel Lavinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joel Lavinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joel Lavinsky Line = papers co-authored together Joel Lavinsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201562
2 202061
3 200730
4 202024
5 201624
6 201522
7 201720
8 201719
9 201715
10 201515
11 201014
12 201212
13 20239
14 20129
15 20208
16 20226
17 20206
18 20215
19 20194
20 20204

About Joel Lavinsky

Joel Lavinsky is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology, Epidemiology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (8 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (8 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (3 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (176 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (45 citations), Speech and Hearing (42 citations), Neurology (41 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations). Joel Lavinsky has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Luíz Lavinsky, Otávio Bejzman Piltcher, Rick A. Friedman, Fabrizio Ricci Romano, Eduardo Macoto Kosugi, Marcus Miranda Lessa, Hooman Allayee, Geraldo Druck Sant’Anna, Marco Aurélio Fornazieri and Eleazar Eskin. Their work appears in journals such as Audiology and Neurotology, Otolaryngology, PLoS Genetics, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology and G3 Genes Genomes Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact