Joel Cramer

778 citations
16 papers · 597 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Joel Cramer

16 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Joel Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 510
  • Condensed Matter Physics 179
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 151
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 253
  • Materials Chemistry 106
Replace Ryugo Iida with:
Ryugo Iida Japan
Andreas Donges Germany
Johannes Mendil Switzerland
Christoph Murer Switzerland
Benedetta Flebus United States
Guilherme Matos Sipahi Brazil
Rajasekhar Medapalli United States
N. S. Averkiev Russia
Zdeněk Kašpar Czechia
Felix Groß Germany
Joel Cramer relative to Ryugo Iida Japan Ryugo Iida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ryugo Iida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joel Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joel Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joel Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joel Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joel Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joel Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joel Cramer. The network helps show where Joel Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joel Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joel Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Joel Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2015153
2 201871
3 202161
4 202042
5 201742
6 201840
7 201536
8
Spin transport across antiferromagnets induced by the spin Seebeck effect
201833
9 201731
10 201725
11 201917
12 202213
13 202013
14 201910
15 20237
16 20193

About Joel Cramer

Joel Cramer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (13 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (8 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (6 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (3 papers), ZnO doping and properties (2 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (1 paper) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (510 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (179 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (151 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (253 citations) and Materials Chemistry (106 citations). Joel Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Mathias Kläui, G. Jakob, Ulrike Ritzmann, U. Nowak, Er‐Jia Guo, Andreas Kehlberger, B. Hillebrands, Caroline A. Ross, Mehmet C. Onbaşlı and D. Hinzke. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Nano Letters, Nature Communications, Advanced Functional Materials and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact