Joe Halpern

573 citations
9 papers · 269 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Joe Halpern

8 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Joe Halpern
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Computer Networks and Communications 128
  • Management Science and Operations Research 58
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 72
  • Artificial Intelligence 132
  • Hardware and Architecture 23
Replace IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg with:
IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg Netherlands
Emily Shen United States
Ea Sonenberg Australia
Roberto Zunino Italy
Justin Hsu United States
Henrik Björklund Sweden
Jean-Marc Vincent France
Stefanie Scherzinger Germany
Amir Kafshdar Goharshady Hong Kong
Marius-Cǎlin Silaghi Switzerland
Joe Halpern relative to IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg Netherlands IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joe Halpern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joe Halpern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe Halpern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe Halpern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joe Halpern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe Halpern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe Halpern. The network helps show where Joe Halpern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Joe Halpern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joe Halpern Line = papers co-authored together Joe Halpern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Joe Halpern

Joe Halpern is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (3 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (2 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (2 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (128 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (58 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (72 citations), Artificial Intelligence (132 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (23 citations). Joe Halpern has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Danny Dolev, Rica Gonen, Ittai Abraham, H. Raymond Strong, Barbara Sımons, Ray Strong, Albert R. Meyer, Rohit Parikh, Ashok K. Chandra and Moshe Tennenholtz. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SIAM Journal on Computing and Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact