Joe Devine

34 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

Joe Devine
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Safety Research 57
  • Development 22
  • Business and International Management 12
  • Health 51
  • Social Psychology 120
Replace Lucio Esposito with:
Lucio Esposito United Kingdom
Stefano Pettinato United States
Fotis Papadopoulos Greece
Meera Kaul Shah United Kingdom
Koen Decancq Belgium
Elena Bárcena‐Martín Spain
Matthew Cummins India
David Kelleher United Kingdom
Didier Blanchet France
Pierluigi Conzo Italy
Joe Devine relative to Lucio Esposito United Kingdom Lucio Esposito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Lucio Esposito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joe Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joe Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joe Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe Devine. The network helps show where Joe Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joe Devine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joe Devine Line = papers co-authored together Joe Devine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200788
2 200659
3 200355
4 201341
5 200639
6 201730
7 200224
8 201119
9 201217
10 201817
11
Assessing Individual Quality of Life in Developing Countries: Piloting a Global PGI in Ethiopia and Bangladesh
200413
12 202012
13 201211
14
Relationships, Happiness and Wellbeing: Insights from Bangladesh
20068
15
Relationships, happiness and well-being: insights from Bangladesh
20067
16 20127
17 20156
18 20066
19 20156
20
Aiding Resilience among the Extreme Poor in Bangladesh
20185

About Joe Devine

Joe Devine is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Soil Science and Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Society, and Development (8 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (57 citations), Development (22 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations), Health (51 citations) and Social Psychology (120 citations). Joe Devine has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Laura Camfield, Ian Gough, Séverine Deneulin, Sarah C. White, Timothy Hinks, Roy Maconachie, Mathilde Maîtrot, Neill Duncan, David Taube and Albert Power. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Happiness Studies, Journal of South Asian Development, The Journal of Southern History, Journal of Contemporary Asia and Culture and Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact