Jochen Meyer

57 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

Jochen Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Human-Computer Interaction 175
  • Applied Psychology 98
  • General Health Professions 198
  • Demography 93
  • Physiology 177
Replace Harm op den Akker with:
Harm op den Akker Netherlands
Elina Mattila Finland
Kate Mercer Canada
Ana Carolina Bertoletti De Marchi Brazil
Aino Ahtinen Finland
Anna Schlomann Germany
Angela Fidler Pfammatter United States
Jesse Cirimele United States
Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink Netherlands
Uba Backonja United States
Jochen Meyer relative to Harm op den Akker Netherlands Harm op den Akker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Harm op den Akker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Meyer. The network helps show where Jochen Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201758
2 201751
3 201841
4 201941
5 201829
6 201729
7 202127
8 201427
9 201626
10 201322
11 201422
12 201919
13 202019
14 201618
15 202017
16 202217
17 200415
18 201714
19 201814
20 201913

About Jochen Meyer

Jochen Meyer is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, General Health Professions, Physiology, Demography and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 61 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (26 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (25 papers), Physical Activity and Health (15 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (13 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers) and Persona Design and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (175 citations), Applied Psychology (98 citations), General Health Professions (198 citations), Demography (93 citations) and Physiology (177 citations). Jochen Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Susanne Boll, Claudia Voelcker‐Rehage, Wilko Heuten, Claudia R. Pischke, Sonia Lippke, Andreas Hein, Manuela Peters, Abdallah El Ali, Daniel A. Epstein and Hajo Zeeb. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, IEEE Multimedia, BMC Public Health, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being and Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact