Jochen Hellbeck

614 citations
20 papers · 286 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jochen Hellbeck

14 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers

Jochen Hellbeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Political Science and International Relations 189
  • History 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
  • Music 9
  • Cultural Studies 21
Replace Sabine Hake with:
Sabine Hake United States
Alan E. Steinweis United States
Steven E. Aschheim Israel
Mark Edele Australia
Catherine Merridale United Kingdom
Eric Langenbacher United States
Werner Hamacher Germany
Martin Broszat Germany
Marina Mogilner United States
Helmut Lethen Germany
Jochen Hellbeck relative to Sabine Hake United States Sabine Hake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Sabine Hake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Hellbeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Hellbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Hellbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Hellbeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Hellbeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Hellbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Hellbeck. The network helps show where Jochen Hellbeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Hellbeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Hellbeck Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Hellbeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2006108
2 200150
3 200048
4 200914
5 200913
6 200413
7 200811
8
Tagebuch aus Moskau 1931-1939
19966
9
Laboratories of the Soviet self : diaries from the Stalin era
19985
10 20005
11 20094
12 20093
13 20082
14 20091
15 20091
16 20111
17 20021
18 20170
19 20180
20 20120

About Jochen Hellbeck

Jochen Hellbeck is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eastern European Communism and Reforms (8 papers), European history and politics (5 papers), Soviet and Russian History (5 papers), German History and Society (4 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (189 citations), History (71 citations), Sociology and Political Science (191 citations), Music (9 citations) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). Jochen Hellbeck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Fritzsche and Peter Holquist. Their work appears in journals such as Kritika, The Russian Review, Cahiers du monde russe, Slavic Review and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact