Jochen Gemmer

2.5k citations
65 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jochen Gemmer

64 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jochen Gemmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.0k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.5k
  • Computational Mathematics 24
  • Condensed Matter Physics 265
  • Artificial Intelligence 521
Replace Ivan M. Khaymovich with:
Ivan M. Khaymovich Russia
Manas Kulkarni India
Günter Mahler Germany
Wojciech De Roeck Belgium
Dragi Karevski France
Julian Léonard United States
Jérôme Dubail France
Justin H. Wilson United States
Jamir Marino Germany
Marco Schiró France
Jochen Gemmer relative to Ivan M. Khaymovich Russia Ivan M. Khaymovich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Ivan M. Khaymovich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Gemmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Gemmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Gemmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Gemmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Gemmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Gemmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Gemmer. The network helps show where Jochen Gemmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Gemmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Gemmer Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Gemmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009219
2 2007151
3 2009122
4 2009117
5 2006101
6 201488
7 200581
8 200169
9 200957
10 202055
11 200853
12 201547
13 202242
14 201541
15 200630
16 201428
17 200727
18 200823
19 201822
20 201920

About Jochen Gemmer

Jochen Gemmer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (45 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (31 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (20 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (16 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (11 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (11 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (8 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.0k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.5k citations), Computational Mathematics (24 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (265 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (521 citations). Jochen Gemmer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Günter Mahler, M. Michel, Robin Steinigeweg, Heinz‐Peter Breuer, Christian Bartsch, Wolfram Brenig, Hannu Christian Wichterich, Jonas Richter, Markus Henrich and A. F. Otte. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. E, Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B. and Physical review. A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact