Jocelyn E. Behm

43 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

Jocelyn E. Behm
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Ecological Modeling 136
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 231
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 220
  • Ecology 248
  • Global and Planetary Change 205
Replace Takeshi Osawa with:
Takeshi Osawa Japan
Merav Seifan Israel
Hubert Höfer Germany
Rhian J. Smith United Kingdom
Mário Santos Portugal
Rafael F. del Castillo Mexico
Rüdiger Kaufmann Austria
Ken Norris United Kingdom
Sandra Quijas Mexico
Alicia Melgoza‐Castillo Mexico
Jocelyn E. Behm relative to Takeshi Osawa Japan Takeshi Osawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Takeshi Osawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jocelyn E. Behm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jocelyn E. Behm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jocelyn E. Behm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jocelyn E. Behm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jocelyn E. Behm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jocelyn E. Behm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jocelyn E. Behm. The network helps show where Jocelyn E. Behm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jocelyn E. Behm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jocelyn E. Behm Line = papers co-authored together Jocelyn E. Behm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013110
2 200994
3 201180
4 202045
5 201842
6 201834
7 202133
8 201832
9 201431
10 201430
11 202228
12 202027
13 201827
14 201726
15 202219
16 202018
17 201317
18 202014
19 201113
20 202312

About Jocelyn E. Behm

Jocelyn E. Behm is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 47 papers that have together received 860 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Isotope Analysis in Ecology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (136 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (231 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (220 citations), Ecology (248 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (205 citations). Jocelyn E. Behm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include E. Toby Kiers, Matthew R. Helmus, R. Tucker Gilman, Daniël J. P. Engelmoer, Anthony R. Ives, Janette W. Boughman, Jacintha Ellers, Xiaodong Yang, Shengjie Liu and Julie Marin. Their work appears in journals such as Ecosphere, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Global Change Biology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact