Joane Matta

41 papers receiving 638 citations

Joane Matta's Hit Papers

Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 Western and Northern Europeans 2021 · 183 citations
1830+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Joane Matta
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Clinical Psychology 205
  • Health 75
  • Biological Psychiatry 22
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Pharmacy 29
Replace Dicken Chan with:
Dicken Chan Hong Kong
Matthew J. McAtee United States
Emily W. Flanagan United States
Deborah Gibson-Smith Netherlands
Rachel M. Ceballos United States
Zhenchan Lu China
Seongho Min South Korea
Laura Chyu United States
Orit Birnbaum‐Weitzman United States
Jean‐Baptiste Bouillon‐Minois France
Joane Matta relative to Dicken Chan Hong Kong Dicken Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Dicken Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joane Matta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joane Matta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joane Matta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joane Matta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joane Matta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joane Matta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joane Matta. The network helps show where Joane Matta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joane Matta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joane Matta Line = papers co-authored together Joane Matta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 Western and Northern Europeans
Hit paper breakdown →
2021183
2 201862
3 201846
4 201844
5 202127
6 202326
7 201925
8 201625
9 202224
10 202322
11 201721
12 201513
13 202013
14 201812
15 20168
16 20187
17 20227
18 20146
19 20206
20 20196

About Joane Matta

Joane Matta is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Neurology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (205 citations), Health (75 citations), Biological Psychiatry (22 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations) and Pharmacy (29 citations). Joane Matta has collaborated with scholars based in France, Lebanon and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Marie Zins, Marcel Goldberg, Sébastien Czernichow, Claire Carette, Cédric Lemogne, Nicolas Hoertel, Maria Melchior, Emmanuelle Kesse‐Guyot, Frédéric Limosin and Emmanuel Wiernik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Scientific Reports, Nutrients, Primary care diabetes and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact