Joane Matta

42 papers receiving 674 citations

Joane Matta's Hit Papers

Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 Western and Northern Europeans 2021 · 190 citations
1900+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Joane Matta
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Clinical Psychology 156
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Health 42
  • Physiology 110
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Yongjie Chen with:
Yongjie Chen China
Zhenchan Lu China
Deborah Gibson-Smith Netherlands
Wei‐Fen Ma Taiwan
Rachel M. Ceballos United States
Tadahiro Ohtsu Japan
Mateusz Grajek Poland
Bibian van der Voorn Netherlands
Arlinda B. Moreno Brazil
Urška Arnautovska Australia
Joane Matta relative to Yongjie Chen China Yongjie Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Yongjie Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joane Matta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joane Matta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joane Matta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joane Matta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joane Matta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joane Matta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joane Matta. The network helps show where Joane Matta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joane Matta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joane Matta Line = papers co-authored together Joane Matta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 Western and Northern Europeans
Hit paper breakdown →
2021190
2 201869
3 201848
4 201845
5 202129
6 201628
7 202328
8 202227
9 202327
10 201926
11 201722
12 202013
13 201513
14 201812
15 20168
16 20147
17 20227
18 20187
19 20206
20 20206

About Joane Matta

Joane Matta is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (9 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (156 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Health (42 citations), Physiology (110 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Joane Matta has collaborated with scholars based in France, Lebanon and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marie Zins, Marcel Goldberg, Sébastien Czernichow, Claire Carette, Cédric Lemogne, Nicolas Hoertel, Frédéric Limosin, Emmanuelle Kesse‐Guyot, Maria Melchior and Emmanuel Wiernik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Scientific Reports, Nutrients, Journal of Affective Disorders and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact