Joan E. Foley

473 citations
20 papers · 309 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Joan E. Foley

20 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Joan E. Foley
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Geography, Planning and Development 33
  • Clinical Psychology 90
  • Automotive Engineering 54
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 82
Replace Claudia Freitag with:
Claudia Freitag Germany
Kathleen A. McCluskey United States
Sheryl Connell Australia
Ramona Cardillo Italy
Charles J. Furst United States
Janet P. Trammell United States
Dionisio Manga Spain
Catherine Mello United States
María Fernanda López-Ramón Spain
Michael Grube Germany
Joan E. Foley relative to Claudia Freitag Germany Claudia Freitag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Claudia Freitag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan E. Foley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan E. Foley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan E. Foley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan E. Foley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan E. Foley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan E. Foley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan E. Foley. The network helps show where Joan E. Foley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Joan E. Foley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan E. Foley Line = papers co-authored together Joan E. Foley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201650
2 201749
3 201540
4 198434
5 201832
6 196921
7 198420
8 196913
9 19749
10 19678
11 20186
12 19766
13 20205
14 19674
15 19704
16 19703
17 20242
18 20201
19 20231
20 19841

About Joan E. Foley

Joan E. Foley is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Automotive Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (90 citations), Automotive Engineering (54 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations). Joan E. Foley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marsha Weinraub, Annabel J. Cohen, Gail Myhr, Ruta Westreich, David M. Dunkley, David C. Zuroff, Nilám Ram, Elizabeth J. Susman, Ihno A. Lee and J. E. Berg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, Behavior Therapy, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Developmental Science and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact