Joan Decker

4.2k citations
184 papers · 3.3k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Joan Decker

175 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Joan Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.2k
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.2k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 34
  • Biomedical Engineering 893
Replace Søren Bang Korsholm with:
Søren Bang Korsholm Denmark
Vincent S Chan United States
Stefan Kragh Nielsen Denmark
Calvin Domier United States
O. Grulke Germany
David L. Brower United States
A. J. H. Donné Netherlands
Mark Kempenaars United Kingdom
Heinrich Peter Laqua Germany
Egbert Westerhof Netherlands
Joan Decker relative to Søren Bang Korsholm Denmark Søren Bang Korsholm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Søren Bang Korsholm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Decker. The network helps show where Joan Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joan Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Decker Line = papers co-authored together Joan Decker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 184 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010254
2 2009109
3 2015103
4 2018101
5 201587
6 197186
7 201164
8 201261
9 202258
10 201557
11 201757
12 201156
13 201352
14 201552
15 201951
16 200850
17 201049
18 201945
19 201645
20 201144

About Joan Decker

Joan Decker is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 184 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (142 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (65 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (65 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (41 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (39 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (29 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (20 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.2k citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.2k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (34 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (893 citations). Joan Decker has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yves Peysson, Stefano Coda, L. Morini, Marc Goniche, Vladimir A. Basiuk, F. Imbeaux, Annika EKEDAHL, Mireille Schneider, Gerardo Giruzzi and Xavier Garbet. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Physics of Plasmas, Fusion Engineering and Design and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact