Joachim Meyer

144 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Joachim Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • General Decision Sciences 116
  • Human-Computer Interaction 253
  • Social Psychology 854
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 176
  • Statistics and Probability 282
Replace Justin G. Hollands with:
Justin G. Hollands Canada
Earl A. Alluisi United States
Alex Kirlik United States
Michael D. Byrne United States
Francis T. Durso United States
Jan Maarten Schraagen Netherlands
John M. Flach United States
J. Gregory Trafton United States
Berndt Brehmer Sweden
John Yen United States
Joachim Meyer relative to Justin G. Hollands Canada Justin G. Hollands's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Justin G. Hollands · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Meyer. The network helps show where Joachim Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 154 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992244
2 2001182
3 2004159
4 2006120
5 2008108
6 2010103
7 199790
8 201188
9 201082
10 199973
11 200969
12 200462
13 201159
14 201059
15 201858
16 199955
17 200250
18 200144
19 200044
20 201343

About Joachim Meyer

Joachim Meyer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Surgery and Information Systems, having authored 154 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (43 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (19 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (16 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (16 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (14 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (12 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (10 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (116 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (253 citations), Social Psychology (854 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (176 citations) and Statistics and Probability (282 citations). Joachim Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Noam Tractinsky, Avishai Henik, Joseph Tzelgov, Talia Lavie, David Shinar, Yuval Bitan, David Leiser, Ohad Inbar, Tamar Ben-Bassat and Joseph F. Coughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Behaviour and Information Technology, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction and Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact