Joachim E. Weber

2.9k citations
62 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Joachim E. Weber

60 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Joachim E. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Rehabilitation 280
  • Internal Medicine 130
  • Epidemiology 805
  • Neurology 263
  • Emergency Medicine 68
Replace Thomas Devlin with:
Thomas Devlin United States
W. Scott Burgin United States
Maxim D. Hammer United States
Victor Urrutia United States
Elisabeth B. Marsh United States
Martin Ebinger Germany
Carly S. Rivers Canada
Sophie K. Piper Germany
Scott Silliman United States
A.A. Rabinstein United States
Joachim E. Weber relative to Thomas Devlin United States Thomas Devlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Thomas Devlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim E. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim E. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim E. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim E. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim E. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim E. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim E. Weber. The network helps show where Joachim E. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim E. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim E. Weber Line = papers co-authored together Joachim E. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014318
2 2014136
3 2003117
4 2012116
5 201688
6 201582
7 201262
8 202259
9 201942
10 200738
11 201034
12
APR - Global Scan Matching Using Anchor Point Relationships
200031
13 201930
14 201527
15 201326
16 201819
17 201619
18 201318
19 200917
20 202216

About Joachim E. Weber

Joachim E. Weber is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Rehabilitation, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (27 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers) and Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (280 citations), Internal Medicine (130 citations), Epidemiology (805 citations), Neurology (263 citations) and Emergency Medicine (68 citations). Joachim E. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Heinrich J. Audebert, Martin Ebinger, Matthias Wendt, Michał Różański, Benjamin Winter, Carolin Waldschmidt, Alexander Kunz, Jochen B. Fiebach, Matthias Endres and Kersten Villringer. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Frontiers in Neurology, Annals of Neurology, International Journal of Stroke and Transfusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact