Joachim Bæch

25 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Joachim Bæch
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 147
  • Hematology 92
  • Oncology 96
  • Genetics 35
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 57
Replace Ombretta Annibali with:
Ombretta Annibali Italy
Jonas Karlén Sweden
Jong Hyung Yoon South Korea
M Gaspard France
Tzung‐Chih Tang Taiwan
Stefan Müller‐Weihrich Germany
Gianna Maria D’Elia Italy
Federico Sackmann Muriel Argentina
Shripad Banavali India
H. Jürgens Germany
Joachim Bæch relative to Ombretta Annibali Italy Ombretta Annibali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Ombretta Annibali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Bæch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Bæch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Bæch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Bæch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Bæch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Bæch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Bæch. The network helps show where Joachim Bæch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Bæch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Bæch Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Bæch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201887
2 201475
3 201859
4 201845
5 201230
6 199923
7 199716
8 202315
9 202315
10 202014
11 20029
12 20227
13 20226
14 20235
15 20034
16 20234
17 20243
18 20223
19 20233
20 20241

About Joachim Bæch

Joachim Bæch is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, Hematology and Surgery, having authored 29 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (8 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (3 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (3 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (147 citations), Hematology (92 citations), Oncology (96 citations), Genetics (35 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (57 citations). Joachim Bæch has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tarec Christoffer El‐Galaly, Lars Christian Gormsen, Andrea Lo, Chan Y. Cheah, Diego Villa, Rudi Steffensen, Hans Erik Johnsen, Kim Varming, Kirsten Nikolajsen and Maja Bech Juul. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Blood Advances, European Journal of Epidemiology, European Journal of Cancer and Hematological Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact