Jo Law

413 citations
14 papers · 324 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Law

12 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Jo Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 244
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Social Psychology 73
  • Artificial Intelligence 107
Replace Peter Blouw with:
Peter Blouw Canada
Tom Heyman Belgium
Sandor Wiseman Canada
Vencislav Popov United States
Sami R. Yousif United States
Noah D. Forrin Canada
Gregory N. Carlson United States
Felicia Hurewitz United States
Kenneth R. Livingston United States
Alison J. S. Sanford United Kingdom
Jo Law relative to Peter Blouw Canada Peter Blouw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Peter Blouw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Law. The network helps show where Jo Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jo Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Law Line = papers co-authored together Jo Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1988162
2 198859
3 198841
4 198822
5 199321
6
A Study of Global Hospital Websites for Accessibility Compliance
20176
7 20225
8
100 Atmospheres: Studies in Scale and Wonder
20193
9 20222
10 20051
11
Enchanting Materialities: e-textiles installations for an ecosophic world
20201
12 20121
13 20220
14
Wong Kar-wai's Cinema: Analogues of Experience
20010

About Jo Law

Jo Law is a scholar working on Museology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (3 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (1 paper) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (244 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (83 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations), Social Psychology (73 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (107 citations). Jo Law has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Endel Tulving, Steven A. Sloman, Nobuo Ohta, Lars‐Göran Nilsson, C. A. Gordon Hayman, et al., Andrew P. Yonelinas, Bradford H. Challis, Joanne M. Kuzma and Nigel Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Animation, Metrologia, Memory and Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact