Jo Guldi
Impact in
- General Social Sciences top 1%
- Computational and Text Analysis Methods
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Papers in
-
- Computational and Text Analysis Methods 7
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 3
- History of Science and Natural History 2
- Co-authors
- David Armitage (7 shared papers)David Andrew Armitage (3 shared papers)Tim Hitchcock (1 shared paper)Andras Zsom (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)Isis (3 papers)Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales (2 papers)Globalizations (1 paper)Public Culture (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Jo Guldi
29 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- General Social Sciences 44
- History and Philosophy of Science 35
- Geography, Planning and Development 34
- History 62
- General Arts and Humanities 6
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Guldi
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Guldi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Guldi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Guldi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Guldi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Guldi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Guldi. The network helps show where Jo Guldi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Jo Guldi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 137 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 10 | Manifiesto por la Historia | 2016 | 12 |
| 11 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 |
About Jo Guldi
Jo Guldi is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, History, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational and Text Analysis Methods (7 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (4 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (2 papers) and Digital and Traditional Archives Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (44 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (34 citations), History (62 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (6 citations). Jo Guldi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include David Armitage, David Andrew Armitage, Tim Hitchcock and Andras Zsom. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Isis, Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales, Globalizations and Public Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.