J.M. Jonker

6 papers receiving 668 citations

J.M. Jonker's Hit Papers

Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review 2012 · 524 citations
5240+4+9Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

J.M. Jonker
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 325
  • Otorhinolaryngology 23
  • Oncology 121
  • Physiology 106
  • Hematology 29
Replace Chie Akiba with:
Chie Akiba United States
H. Wildiers France
Marika Anna Rasschaert Belgium
I. Boler United States
Eric T. Lubiner United States
Nicoleta Reinald France
J.P. Jacquin France
J. Provençal France
Ruud Van Rijswijk Belgium
Yat Ming Lau China
J.M. Jonker relative to Chie Akiba United States Chie Akiba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Chie Akiba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Jonker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Jonker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Jonker. The network helps show where J.M. Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside J.M. Jonker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.M. Jonker Line = papers co-authored together J.M. Jonker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review
Hit paper breakdown →
2012524
2 200198
3 201428
4 201417
5 20129
6 20148

About J.M. Jonker

J.M. Jonker is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physiology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 6 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (1 paper), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper) and Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (325 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (23 citations), Oncology (121 citations), Physiology (106 citations) and Hematology (29 citations). J.M. Jonker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marije Emilie Hamaker, Carolien H. Smorenburg, Alinda G. Vos, Barbara C. Van Munster, Paul R. van der Valk, Simone W. Span, Frank A.E. Kruyt, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Giuseppe Giaccone and Pieter E. Postmus. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, The Lancet Oncology, British journal of surgery, Journal of Geriatric Oncology and European Journal of Cancer Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact