J.M. Ingram

54 papers receiving 725 citations

Peers

J.M. Ingram
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 229
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 266
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 149
  • Aerospace Engineering 388
  • General Materials Science 32
Replace Isabelle Sochet with:
Isabelle Sochet France
Seok Cho South Korea
Yoshio Nakayama Japan
F. Jia United Kingdom
Marina Silvestrini Italy
Manfred Staat Germany
Roberto Suárez Ojeda Australia
Martin Larcher Italy
Sagnik Mazumdar United States
Richard Clayton United States
J.M. Ingram relative to Isabelle Sochet France Isabelle Sochet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Isabelle Sochet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Ingram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Ingram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Ingram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Ingram. The network helps show where J.M. Ingram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside J.M. Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.M. Ingram Line = papers co-authored together J.M. Ingram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981116
2 201267
3 201356
4 195152
5 201249
6 202040
7 201337
8 201232
9 202224
10 201323
11 198519
12 201217
13 197213
14 199811
15 195211
16 201910
17 201810
18 201810
19 20139
20 20149

About J.M. Ingram

J.M. Ingram is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Obstetrics and Gynecology and General Materials Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (23 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (16 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (13 papers), Engineering and Material Science Research (8 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (4 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (3 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (229 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (266 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (149 citations), Aerospace Engineering (388 citations) and General Materials Science (32 citations). J.M. Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include P.G. Holborn, A.F. Averill, P.F. Nolan, P. Battersby, Emil Novak, Jared Williams, Marian Lake, Andrew Rolt, Bayard Carter and Vishal Sethi. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Transactions of the IMF, Process Safety and Environmental Protection and Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact