J.L. Schwing

43 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

J.L. Schwing
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 113
  • Hardware and Architecture 63
  • Computer Networks and Communications 177
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 117
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 82
Replace Patrick Dymond with:
Patrick Dymond Canada
Frank Hadlock United States
Stefan Näher Germany
Ondřej Sýkora Slovakia
James Hegarty United States
Kurt Mehlhorn Germany
Yefim Dinitz Israel
K. Takamizawa Japan
Yosi Ben-Asher Israel
Lata Narayanan Canada
J.L. Schwing relative to Patrick Dymond Canada Patrick Dymond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Patrick Dymond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.L. Schwing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.L. Schwing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.L. Schwing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.L. Schwing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.L. Schwing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.L. Schwing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.L. Schwing. The network helps show where J.L. Schwing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside J.L. Schwing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.L. Schwing Line = papers co-authored together J.L. Schwing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199240
2 199934
3 199427
4 199326
5 200020
6 199518
7 199212
8 199511
9 199510
10 199210
11 19999
12 19969
13 19938
14 19937
15 19947
16 19937
17 19847
18 19926
19 19976
20 19955

About J.L. Schwing

J.L. Schwing is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 48 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (29 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (15 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (14 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (10 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (10 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (7 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (5 papers) and Advanced Graph Theory Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (113 citations), Hardware and Architecture (63 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (177 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (117 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (82 citations). J.L. Schwing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Olariu, Jinming Zhang, Koji Nakano, R. Lin, L. Wilson, Ivan Stojmenović, Ji Zhang, Frank Stenger, Cristina M. Pinotti and Albert Y. Zomaya. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, BIT Numerical Mathematics, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact