J.L. Gerlock

75 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

J.L. Gerlock
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 75
  • Polymers and Plastics 320
  • Biophysics 124
  • Bioengineering 111
  • Catalysis 131
Replace D. O. Hummel with:
D. O. Hummel Germany
John R. Ebdon United Kingdom
Dolores Esquivel Spain
Raquel Portela Spain
Luigi Coppola Italy
Séverinne Rigolet France
Reyes Mallada Spain
Nuria García Spain
A.M. Shams El Din Egypt
Eli M. Pearce United States
J.L. Gerlock relative to D. O. Hummel Germany D. O. Hummel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
D. O. Hummel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.L. Gerlock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.L. Gerlock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.L. Gerlock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.L. Gerlock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.L. Gerlock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.L. Gerlock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.L. Gerlock. The network helps show where J.L. Gerlock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.L. Gerlock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.L. Gerlock Line = papers co-authored together J.L. Gerlock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199570
2 199865
3 199964
4 199458
5 199558
6 199045
7 198443
8 199242
9 199537
10 199737
11 199036
12 198636
13 198833
14 198632
15 198331
16 199131
17 199531
18 200131
19 199130
20 199529

About J.L. Gerlock

J.L. Gerlock is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (16 papers), Photopolymerization techniques and applications (15 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (15 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (10 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (9 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (6 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (5 papers) and Odor and Emission Control Technologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (75 citations), Polymers and Plastics (320 citations), Biophysics (124 citations), Bioengineering (111 citations) and Catalysis (131 citations). J.L. Gerlock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include David R. Bauer, Deborah F. Mielewski, Mark E. Nichols, Edward G. Janzen, C.A. Smith, A.V. Kucherov, M. Shelef, Hung-Wen Jen, David R. Bauer and Alexei V. Kucherov. Their work appears in journals such as Polymer Degradation and Stability, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Progress in Organic Coatings and Macromolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact