J.I.T. Stenhouse

567 citations
25 papers · 466 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J.I.T. Stenhouse

23 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

J.I.T. Stenhouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Computational Mechanics 186
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 369
  • Materials Chemistry 201
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 52
  • Environmental Engineering 47
Replace Augustin Charvet with:
Augustin Charvet France
Jean‐Christophe Appert‐Collin France
Soleiman Bourrous France
Yunlong Han China
Amit V. Mahulkar India
HungMin Chein Taiwan
Juha Harra Finland
C. Motzkus France
Mengshi Lu China
Charlotte Brogren Sweden
J.I.T. Stenhouse relative to Augustin Charvet France Augustin Charvet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Augustin Charvet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.I.T. Stenhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.I.T. Stenhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.I.T. Stenhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.I.T. Stenhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.I.T. Stenhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.I.T. Stenhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.I.T. Stenhouse. The network helps show where J.I.T. Stenhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside J.I.T. Stenhouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.I.T. Stenhouse Line = papers co-authored together J.I.T. Stenhouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199785
2 199867
3 199457
4 199637
5 199733
6 196926
7 199725
8 198723
9 199621
10 199118
11 199016
12 197015
13 199210
14 19927
15 19906
16 19725
17 19954
18
Clogging of an electrically active fibrous filter material: Experimental results and 2D simulations
19973
19 19962
20 19922

About J.I.T. Stenhouse

J.I.T. Stenhouse is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering, Polymers and Plastics and Water Science and Technology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (16 papers), Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (5 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (4 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (4 papers), Coagulation and Flocculation Studies (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers), Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (2 papers) and High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (186 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (369 citations), Materials Chemistry (201 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (52 citations) and Environmental Engineering (47 citations). J.I.T. Stenhouse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bin Liu, Remi Trottier, D.C. Freshwater, B. Y. H. Liu and P Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aerosol Science, Powder Technology, Aerosol Science and Technology, Chemical Engineering Science and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact