J.I.T. Stenhouse

571 citations
28 papers · 490 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J.I.T. Stenhouse

25 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

J.I.T. Stenhouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computational Mechanics 194
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 382
  • Materials Chemistry 205
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 49
  • Biomaterials 44
Replace Augustin Charvet with:
Augustin Charvet France
Jean‐Christophe Appert‐Collin France
Soleiman Bourrous France
HungMin Chein Taiwan
Juha Harra Finland
C. Motzkus France
Masayuki Adachi Japan
Mengshi Lu China
Junxiang Shi United States
Liang Guo China
J.I.T. Stenhouse relative to Augustin Charvet France Augustin Charvet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Augustin Charvet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.I.T. Stenhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.I.T. Stenhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.I.T. Stenhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.I.T. Stenhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.I.T. Stenhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.I.T. Stenhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.I.T. Stenhouse. The network helps show where J.I.T. Stenhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside J.I.T. Stenhouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.I.T. Stenhouse Line = papers co-authored together J.I.T. Stenhouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199788
2 199872
3 199459
4 199638
5 199735
6 196927
7 198726
8 199725
9 199621
10 199118
11 199017
12 197015
13 199211
14 19928
15 19907
16 19725
17 19954
18
Clogging of an electrically active fibrous filter material: Experimental results and 2D simulations
19973
19 19922
20 19702

About J.I.T. Stenhouse

J.I.T. Stenhouse is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering, Polymers and Plastics and Water Science and Technology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (18 papers), Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (6 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (5 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (5 papers), Coagulation and Flocculation Studies (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers), Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (2 papers) and Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (194 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (382 citations), Materials Chemistry (205 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (49 citations) and Biomaterials (44 citations). J.I.T. Stenhouse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bin Liu, Remi Trottier, D.C. Freshwater, B. Y. H. Liu, R. Akers and P Lloyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aerosol Science, Powder Technology, Chemical Engineering Science, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal and Aerosol Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact