Jim Stone

818 citations
36 papers · 419 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jim Stone

32 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Jim Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Philosophy 196
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • History and Philosophy of Science 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 142
  • Reproductive Medicine 30
Replace David B. Hershenov with:
David B. Hershenov United States
Hallvard Lillehammer United Kingdom
William Hasker United States
Jens Johansson Sweden
Rebecca Roache United Kingdom
Don Marquis United States
Abrol Fairweather United States
Connie S. Rosati United States
Bruce N. Waller United States
Carrie Jenkins United Kingdom
Jim Stone relative to David B. Hershenov United States David B. Hershenov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David B. Hershenov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Stone. The network helps show where Jim Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jim Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Stone Line = papers co-authored together Jim Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000170
2 198759
3 199740
4 200718
5 199416
6 199413
7 198811
8 200510
9 20059
10 20038
11 20008
12 19988
13 19846
14 19915
15 20014
16 20134
17 19814
18 20223
19 20013
20
Debunking the Myths. Research Offers Ammunition to Fight Misperceptions of Voc Ed.
19932

About Jim Stone

Jim Stone is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 36 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (196 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (142 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (30 citations). Jim Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric T. Olson, KAREN E. WARDEN, Bradford L. Currier, Kai‐Nan An, Stewart W. Breck, Julie K. Young, Fredric A. Gorin, Marilyn Friedman, Matthew Hyde and Jonathan Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Religious Studies and Pacific philosophical quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact