Jim Stone
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 15
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 11
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 10
- Co-authors
- Eric T. Olson (1 shared paper)Kai‐Nan An (1 shared paper)KAREN E. WARDEN (1 shared paper)Bradford L. Currier (1 shared paper)Matthew Hyde (1 shared paper)Marilyn Friedman (1 shared paper)Julie K. Young (1 shared paper)Kyran Kunkel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (8 papers)Analysis (5 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (4 papers)Religious Studies (3 papers)Bioethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jim Stone
32 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Philosophy 244
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
- Cognitive Neuroscience 180
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- Reproductive Medicine 35
Countries citing papers authored by Jim Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Stone. The network helps show where Jim Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jim Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 198 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 85 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 3 |
About Jim Stone
Jim Stone is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Surgery and Social Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (244 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (35 citations). Jim Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric T. Olson, Kai‐Nan An, KAREN E. WARDEN, Bradford L. Currier, Matthew Hyde, Marilyn Friedman, Julie K. Young, Kyran Kunkel, Christina Hoff Sommers and Bernard H. Baumrin. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Religious Studies and Bioethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.